slot gacor 777 raja slot winsgoal
scatter hitam tambang88 deposit 5000 tambang88
karo88
Innovation and IP – Page 19 – ACT | The App Association

Exemption for jailbreaking shows, again, that the DMCA works!

The Librarian of Congress and the Register of Copyright conducted another thorough review of requested exemptions to the DMCA and issued six new well-reasoned exemptions. ACT believes the exemptions issued demonstrate the flexibility of the DMCA to adequately protect copyright owners, provide incentives for new innovation, and enable consumers and [...]

By |2010-07-28T15:10:33-04:00July 28th, 2010|Blog, Innovation and IP|

ACT Member Peter Carnes Storms the House!

CT member Peter Carnes (CEO of Traffax, Inc.) testified before of the House Committee on Small Business today about “The Impact of Intellectual Property on Entrepreneurship and Job Creation”. Peter shared the stage with a really diverse group of IP owners – from ABRO, which has problems protecting its trademarks, [...]

By |2016-12-21T00:14:49-05:00July 22nd, 2010|Blog, Innovation and IP, Patents, Tech Regulation, Uncategorized|

Supreme Court Upholds Software Patents in Bilski; “IP Sucks” Camp Mourns

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Bilski v. Kappos, finding that Bilski’s patent was not valid, but reaffirming the patentability of methods and software. Those in the "IP Sucks" camp were hoping the court would embrace their vision and overturn the entire concept software patents. Thankfully, their hopes and dreams lie shattered on the floor soaked in tears, much like my hopes for a USA semifinal birth in the World Cup.

By |2016-12-21T00:14:49-05:00June 28th, 2010|Blog, Innovation and IP, Patents|

Antitrust Experts Engage Debate (Virtually) Merits of FTC’s Use of Section 5 Authority in Intel Case

Over the past few weeks an online debate has been brewing between antitrust scholars over the FTC case against Intel. The focus of the debate has been the FTC's decision to pursue most of its case using its Section 5 authority to prevent "unfair and deceptive" practices, rather than its Section 2 authority for combating anti-competitive behavior. The discussion began with a piece by Bob Litan, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department in the Clinton Administration, entitled "The FTC's Radical Application of Section 5." As the title suggests, Litan has some serious concerns about the FTC's case in general and its application of Section 5. It's a pretty compelling piece that I recommend to all you antitrust geeks, but if you're short on time/attention span I'll try to summarize.

By |2016-12-21T00:14:49-05:00April 19th, 2010|Blog, Innovation and IP, Patents, Tech Regulation|

This Week in Antitrust

This week's look at antitrust news features a group of liquid-crystal display panel manufacturers accused of conspiring to fix prices, the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust investigation of Intel and the effects it will have on the computer industry, a milk-pricing investigation in New York, and the dismissal of Novell's antitrust complaints against Microsoft. [...]

By |2016-12-21T00:14:49-05:00April 2nd, 2010|Blog, Innovation and IP|
Go to Top