Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

ACT Applauds Supreme Court Decision on Video Game First Amendment Rights

Monday, June 27th, 2011

The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) applauds the Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision today in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association striking down a California law that prohibited, in part, the sale of certain video games to minors. ACT Executive Director Morgan Reed issued the following statement.

One of the most important aspects of this decision was the court’s recognition of media equality; electronic media receive the same first amendment protections as books and movies.

The Court correctly noted that, “the basic principles of freedom of speech and the press . . . do not vary ‘when a new and different medium for communication appears.’” This recognition that all content creators enjoy the same constitutional rights, regardless of the format, provides a strong foundation on which emerging technologies may rely. In addition, the Supreme Court today helped remind us that our founders likely did not want laws disfavoring certain industries on the basis of technology.

The Court recognized that voluntary, self-regulatory rating systems like the ESRB rating system for video games may provide a better mechanism for creators to communicate information about content to parents than overly broad laws.

ACT Member Company InterKnowlogy to be Featured on Tonight’s Grey’s Anatomy Episode

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

Tonight’s episode of the Emmy Award Winning TV series Grey’s Anatomy will feature ACT member company InterKnowlogy’s groundbreaking Multi-touch capable 3D digital anatomical image product suite. InterKnowlogy designed this three dimensional application suite to help with angiography, surgical, and anatomical procedures and research in the healthcare and life sciences industry.

In tonight’s episode you’ll see Grey’s Anatomy “doctors” using the software to zoom and rotate a 3D image of a patient’s heart with their hands on a large touch screen computing device, the Microsoft Surface. InterKnowlogy’s application suite has proven remarkably useful to researchers and educators because they can use the touch screen to zoom in and leave notes, or draw stents, on specific areas of the 3D image of the patient’s organs. This information can then be stored remotely, on the cloud, where it can be accessed by other health professionals anywhere in the world.

A video demonstration may seen here, http://bit.ly/VitruView

VitruView highlights one of the ways in which cloud computing offers tremendous opportunities for innovation and scientific advances. Cloud computing is a dramatic development in internet services which allows users to shift all of their work online. They then simply use a web browser to run applications and save data, all of which is stored on remote servers, or “in the cloud.” The emergence of cloud-based services has helped to fuel the explosive growth of mobile devices such as the iPhone and other smartphones, which allow users to run applications that use data stored on the cloud.

The Grey’s Anatomy episode featuring VitruView airs tonight on ABC at 9pm EST. The show can be viewed after it airs at the ABC website here, http://abc.go.com/shows/greys-anatomy#.

ACT’s Morgan Reed Joins White House IP Czar and Industry Leaders on ITIF Event on IP Protection

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

(Washington)—Association of Competitive Technology Executive Director Morgan Reed today appeared with tech industry leaders and Victoria Espinel, the White House IP Czar, at the ITIF event, The Next Generation of IP Protection: Enhancing Global Economic Growth and Prosperity.

Reed used the forum to explain how the impact of piracy felt by small business is often greater than that experienced by larger corporations.

“The Administration’s plan, formulated by Victoria Espinel, provides a good starting point to address the issue of piracy,” said Reed. “Coming from the technology industry we are pleased to see the focus on the Internet and the need to cut red tape and increase efficiency within the Customs Department and other agencies.

“Much of the discussion on this issue is rooted in ‘big numbers by big companies’ but in fact piracy often has as a disproportionate impact on small software companies, especially those building specialty apps. Our members at ACT report experiencing piracy firsthand. We have cases in which small companies are required to retain a full-time employee solely to combat piracy, managing stolen license codes and helping those with legitimate codes get their stolen codes corrected. This can take up to one-sixth of a small business’s revenue.

“We are concerned about piracy because support for intellectual property will drive innovation, create new high paying jobs, and bolster productivity.”

ACT Applauds Progress on ECPA and Cloud Computing

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) applauds the steps taken by the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to highlight concerns addressing cloud computing and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. Cloud computing is a new development in internet services which allows consumers to shift their work online using a web browser to run applications and save data, all of which is stored on remote servers, or “in the cloud.”

“The marketplace is rapidly adopting cloud computing,” said ACT President Jonathan Zuck. “With the explosive growth of smartphones and tablets, consumers are embracing mobile computing and the applications in the cloud that add functionality to their devices. Companies large and small are eager to take advantage of the convenience of remotely stored data and applications.

“This nascent industry is a growth area in our economy, with innovation producing jobs and growing new businesses. Unfortunately, the law has not kept pace with technology and the uncertainty this produces threatens to stifle growth. Statutes written to provide security when the most sophisticated consumer device was an answering machine simply cannot guide industry and lawmakers in the digital age.

“Both industry and consumer privacy organizations have come together to adopt a common set of principles to guide lawmakers. U.S. companies and small business software developers are poised to begin work producing new products and services. We urgently need Congress to take action and update our laws so U.S. companies can thrive and take the lead in this new global marketplace.”

ACT Statement on FTC-Intel Settlement

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

President of the Association for Competitive Technology, Jonathan Zuck, issued the following statement on the Intel-FTC settlement announced today. This agreement brings to a close the Commission’s case against Intel regarding alleged anti-competitive trade practices. As part of the settlement, Intel agreed to modify its rebate program and licensing agreements.

“This settlement puts an end to an unwelcome distraction for an important segment of the tech industry. The FTC’s dependence on the ambiguously worded Section 5 of the FTC Act would have ensured a prolonged legal battle with a very uncertain outcome. These ongoing legal machinations would have undoubtedly taken resources and attention away from the research and development that drive Moore’s Law and consumer benefits. Now Intel and other affected companies can get back to innovating and competing on the merits.”

Supreme Court Upholds Software Patents in Bilski Decision

Monday, June 28th, 2010

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Bilski v. Kappos, finding that Bilski’s patent was not valid, but reaffirming the patentability of methods and software. In response to the decision, ACT executive director Morgan Reed said:

“The Supreme Court reaffirmed what we have always known: the world of software is filled with inventions deserving of protection through the patent system.  Just a few minutes playing with a Tivo, an iPhone, or Adobe Photoshop proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Patent quality is still clearly a problem for PTO on software and other method patents, but the Supreme Court rightfully chose not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Bad patents are the problem, not the patentability of methods and software. What is needed is real effort to reform the system and prevent bad patents from ever being granted.”

Some key lines from the decision include:

In discussing the foundations of patent law:

Section 101 specifies four independent categories of inventions or discoveries that are patent eligible: “process[es],” “machin[es],” “manufactur[es],” and “composition[s] of matter.” “In choosing such expansive terms, . . . Congress plainly contemplated that the patent laws would be given wide scope,” Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U. S. 303, 308, in order to ensure that “ ‘ingenuity should receive a liberal encouragement,’ ” id., at 308–309.

An invention need not be a machine or create physical transformation:

The machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for patent eligibility under §101.

The Court is unaware of any ordinary, contemporary, common meaning of “process” that would require it to be tied to a machine or the transformation of an article.

Patent Law Does Not Exclude Business Methods or Software Patents:

(c) Section 101 similarly precludes a reading of the term “process” that would categorically exclude business methods. The term “method” within §100(b)’s “process” definition, at least as a textual matter and before other consulting other Patent Act limitations and this Court’s precedents, may include at least some methods of doing business. The Court is unaware of any argument that the “ordinary, contemporary, common meaning,” Diehr, supra, at 182, of “method” excludes business methods. Nor is it clear what a business method exception would sweep in and whether it would exclude technologies for conducting a business more efficiently. The categorical exclusion argument is further undermined by the fact that federal law explicitly contemplates the existence of at least some business method patents:

ACT Responds to FTC Antitrust Suit Against Intel

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

ACT RESPONDS TO FTC LAWSUIT AGAINST INTEL

FTC IGNORES PLEAS FOR CAUTION AND FILES LATE HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT

Washington – Today, the Federal Trade Commission sued Intel Corp. charging that the company has abused its dominant position in the computer chip market.  This lawsuit comes just days after ACT asked the FTC to proceed with extreme caution in this case, because it has the potential to disturb the dynamics that have pushed the chip industry to unprecedented levels of innovation and price decreases over the past 40 years.

In response to the lawsuit, ACT president Jonathan Zuck said:

“The FTC’s complaint is a hasty solution to some hypothetical and imaginary issues. Following the settlement between Intel and AMD that resolved the core issues that the FTC has been investigating for more than two years, the FTC has slapped together a completely new set of allegations into this complaint. The result is a complaint reads like a late homework assignment, with little substance and lots of rhetoric.”

“The decision to pursue a case under Section 5 versus Section 2 of the Sherman Act seems to be a realization that it is impossible to make the case that consumers have been harmed by higher prices or less innovation. Commissioner Rousch admits as much in his opinion.  The pace of innovation and price reductions in the chip market is simply unparalleled by any other industry.”

“One of the most troubling aspects of this complaint is that it appears to advocate for an expropriation of Intel’s intellectual property, which is a dangerous precedent for all innovative firms large and small.”

“The real question is “why is the FTC rushing this case?” They took more than 2 years to investigate their concerns about Intel’s pricing programs without filing a case, but they are now pushing these new claims out the door without giving them more than a couple months of thought? All companies deserve a fair and transparent investigation.”


As ACT found in our recent study, Exponential Innovation, the computer chip market is delivering unparalleled benefits to consumers and OEMS.

  • Innovation Levels Outpace Any Other Industry – The chip industry has kept pace with Moore’s Law, doubling the speed of computer chips every 18-24 months.  From 2000-2008 alone, the speed of the average chip has increased by 28 times.
  • Chipmakers Continue Massive R&D Investments – Chipmakers spent $45.7 billion in 2007 on R&D and related engineering activities.  With R&D investments greater than 15 percent of sales, chipmakers rank among the top R&D investors in a cross-industry comparison.   In absolute numbers, the semiconductor industry is expected to spend nearly $35 billion in 2009, placing it below the pharmaceutical industry but above the software industry, which includes such R&D heavyweights as Microsoft and Google.
  • Prices Decrease Faster Than Any Other Industry – According the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the quality-adjusted price of computer processors has fallen faster than any other industry in the past decade.  Computing power that cost $2.73 in 1996 cost a penny in 2006, and, from 2000 to 2008, relative processor performance among high-end chips increased by approximately 28 times while the price was cut in half.

The full “Exponential Innovation” Report can be found here: http://www.actonline.org/library/act-paper-exponential-innovation.pdf

ACT and 37 Small Tech Firms Urge FTC To Proceed with Caution on Intel

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

ACT and 37 Small Tech Firms Urge FTC To Proceed with Caution on Intel

ACT Submits to the FTC a New Analysis of Computer Chip Market and Letter from 37 Tech Firms

Washington – The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) announced today that it is asking the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to proceed with extreme caution and avoid any actions that may reduce incentives for innovation or raise chip prices as the agency continues its antitrust review of Intel and computer chip market.  ACT recently presented the Commission a letter signed by 37 members and a new analysis of innovation in the computer chip market and its symbiotic relationship with software innovation.

ACT and its members are particularly concerned by recent reports suggesting that the FTC is still considering antitrust action against Intel despite the recent private settlement between Intel and AMD.

“While competitors and their lawyers can debate the merits of various types of rebate programs, no one is debating the fact that Intel, AMD and others are delivering incredible innovation and value for software developers and consumers. No other industry can match the pace of innovation reflected in Moore’s Law or the rapid price declines that have defined this market for the past forty years.  The FTC must be very careful not to disturb the incentives that have been driving market players to roll out better and lower priced chips every year,” said ACT president Jonathan Zuck.

37 small information technology companies signed onto a letter that was also sent to the FTC urging the consider this matter thoroughly.

“The health and vibrancy of the computer chip market are beyond debate. Therefore, we in the software development community ask government regulators to proceed with extreme caution and avoid any actions that may reduce innovation or lead to higher chip prices,” said the letter.

Software developers like those represented on the petition rely heavily on processor innovation and cost decreases to enable new features and innovations in their own products.  The drastic increases in speed and decreases in price are making ground-breaking new medical, gaming, and animation software possible.

ACT’s report entitled “Exponential Innovation” by Braden Cox and Nora von Ingersleben finds that the computer chip market is incredibly innovative and competitive.

  • Innovation Levels Outpace Any Other Industry – The chip industry has kept pace with Moore’s Law, doubling the speed of computer chips every 18-24 months.  From 2000-2008 alone, the speed of the average chip has increased by 28 times.
  • Chipmakers Continue Massive R&D Investments – Chipmakers spent $45.7 billion in 2007 on R&D and related engineering activities.  With R&D investments greater than 15 percent of sales, chipmakers rank among the top R&D investors in a cross-industry comparison.   In absolute numbers, the semiconductor industry is expected to spend nearly $35 billion in 2009, placing it below the pharmaceutical industry but above the software industry, which includes such R&D heavyweights as Microsoft and Google.
  • Prices Decrease Faster Than Any Other Industry – According the Bureau of Labor statistics, the quality-adjusted price of computer processors has fallen faster than any other industry in the past decade.  Computing power that cost $2.73 in 1996 cost a penny in 2006, and, from 2000 to 2008, relative processor performance among high-end chips increased by approximately 28 times while the price was cut in half.


The full letter can be found here: http://www.actonline.org/documents/091210-act-letter-to-ftc-on-intel.pdf

The full “Exponential Innovation” Report can be found here: http://www.actonline.org/library/act-paper-exponential-innovation.pdf


The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) is an international education and advocacy group for the technology industry. Focusing on the interests of small and mid-size entrepreneurial technology companies, ACT advocates for a “Healthy Tech Environment” that promotes innovation, competition and investment. ACT has been active on issues such as intellectual property, international trade, e-commerce, privacy, internet policy and antitrust. ACT represents more than 3000 software developers, systems integrators, IT consulting and training firms, and e-businesses from around the world.

ACT Statement on New York Attorney General’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Statement of Association for Competitive Technology President Jonathan Zuck on New York Attorney General’s Antitrust Lawsuit Against Intel

“The software development community is concerned that this lawsuit will be counterproductive and may jeopardize the unparalleled innovation and value the chip industry has produced over the past 20 years. While the attorney general makes some bold accusations about Intel’s behavior, experts are already questioning whether there is any real evidence to support the complaint.”

“The fact that the chip industry has delivered exponential innovation while decreasing prices faster than any other technology industry seems to be a significant hole in the case. From 2000 to 2008, computer chips have gotten 28x faster at the same time real prices have dropped by nearly 50 percent.”

“We in the software industry have benefited greatly from the vigorous competition and innovation in the chip market.  It has enabled us to deliver touch interfaces, powerful health IT solutions, and fostered the evolution from ‘Pong’ to the lifelike reality of modern game technology like ‘The Sims’ and ‘Halo.’”

“New York’s effort to micromanage competition in the chip market may benefit AMD, but it is also likely to harm the interests of software developers and consumers.”

The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) is an international education and advocacy group for the technology industry. Focusing on the interests of small and mid-size entrepreneurial technology companies, ACT advocates for a “Healthy Tech Environment” that promotes innovation, competition and investment. ACT has been active on issues such as intellectual property, international trade, e-commerce, privacy, internet policy and antitrust. ACT represents more than 3000 software developers, systems integrators, IT consulting and training firms, and e-businesses from around the world.

EU INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORK SCORES OWN GOAL

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008

STATEMENT BY JONATHAN ZUCK, PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGY

At a conference today, the European Commission presented a revised European Interoperability Framework, which defines the general rules and principles for collaboration on interoperability between Member States and EU institutions. Jonathan Zuck, President of the Association for Competitive Technology, said:  “The EU scores an own goal with this document. It aims to facilitate digital cooperation among European administrations, but in effect it excludes many well-established technologies from being used for e-Government services due to a narrow definition of open standards. This will hurt first and foremost innovative tech start-ups that rely on patent protection to establish themselves in the marketplace.”

Zuck added:  “Contrary to what is often said, commercial software is not the playground of big business, but primarily of inventive SMEs thriving in niche markets. Only the protection of their intellectual property permits those innovators to create growth and jobs. Commercial software must be allowed to compete on a level-playing field with other software types. Public procurement decisions should be based on technology neutrality. Governments ought to buy software on its merits and not through categorical preferences. To demand anything else is to impose one business model over another.”

The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) is an international education and advocacy group for the technology industry. Focusing on the interests of small and mid-size entrepreneurial technology companies, ACT advocates for a “Healthy Tech Environment” that promotes innovation, competition and investment. ACT has been active on issues such as intellectual property, international trade, e-commerce, privacy, internet policy and antitrust. ACT represents more than 3000 software developers, systems integrators, IT consulting and training firms, and e-businesses from around the world.