Archive for the ‘Press Release’ Category

Praise for the Register of Copyrights

Wednesday, March 20th, 2013

Executive Director of the Association for Competitive Technology Morgan Reed issued a statement today in support of steps proposed by the Register of Copyrights to initiate a review of intellectual property law.

ACT applauds the Register of Copyrights for recognizing the need to review intellectual property law in the evolving environment of the digital economy. With content delivery now occurring on a wide range of consumer devices in a mobile setting, new copyright issues are emerging that will have a profound impact on the technology industry.

The mobile app industry is experiencing dramatic growth creating more than half a million jobs in its five years of existence. Innovation in this space occurs rapidly and the importance of copyright protection is becoming more pronounced. The marketplace is poised to reach $20 billion in revenues, but the sharp increase in app piracy threatens the future of the mobile ecosystem. We look forward to working with Congress, the Register of Copyrights, and other stakeholders to address this serious problem confronting our industry.

COPPA – IMPROVED FOR BIG COMPANIES, NOT FOR EDUCATION STARTUPS

Wednesday, December 19th, 2012

Today, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission announced updates to the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) that addresses many of the concerns of industry.   In response to the new rules, Association for Competitive Technology Executive Director Morgan Reed made the following statement:

Final Rule Makes Important Changes for Large Companies and Platforms

“ACT and the app developer community appreciate the FTC’s efforts to address to remove ambiguity and address the concerns of large companies  and app platforms.  These changes are welcome, but the FTC did not do enough to ensure continued opportunities for educational app startups.”

“While we appreciate the efforts of Chairman Leibowitz, we are particularly concerned with his expectation that the industry will simply find a solution to the new rules.   It is akin to jumping off a cliff with the plan to build the parachute on the way down.  While that may work for big companies, small companies lack the silk and line to build that parachute before they hit the ground. “

Where will Educational Innovation Come From?

“Today, tens of thousands of independent app developers from around the country are building the future of education.  I am worried who will be left to finish that work tomorrow.

“These innovators want to provide groundbreaking educational innovations while protecting the privacy of their users, but $9,500 in legal fees represents more than a year’s worth of income for most educational apps. Moreover, even if an app does not actually require COPPA parental consent, the complexity of these rules will require most educational app developers to spend thousands of dollars in legal fees to confirm one way or another.”

Third Party Plug-ins Are Critical to Educational App Startups

“We are very concerned about the implementation of this rule, especially as it applies to the use of third party plug-in technologies that make the app ecosystem possible.  At the press conference today, the speakers spent an extraordinary amount of time demonizing these technologies and suggesting the eventual implementation of the new rules would make it difficult for educational app startups to survive.  While large, vertically-integrated firms like Google never need to use third party plug-ins, the startup community is dependent on analytics, classroom tools, and other services provided by their partners.”

The Mobile Industry is Giving Parents New Tools, Making COPPA-style Consent Less Important

“In the mobile space, companies like Apple and Microsoft are giving parents the ability to control directly app downloads, app use, and data collection and sharing regardless of decisions made by the app developer.  These tools make the need for such drastic changes to the COPPA rules completely unnecessary. This is one area where the industry needs to work directly with the FTC to educate and empower parents and developers on best practices for protecting children’s privacy.”

For more information or to setup an interview with Morgan Reed, please contact Mark Blafkin at 202.420.7483.  ACT can also provide educational app developers who can discuss their concerns in detail.

ACT RESPONDS TO FTC REPORT ON “MOBILE APPS FOR KIDS”

Monday, December 10th, 2012

Today, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission released a new report entitled “Mobile Apps for Kids” that highlighted a persistent privacy transparency gap on mobile apps for children. During their press conference, the FTC highlighted the Association for Competitive Technology’s education and transparency efforts as “promising.”

In response to the report, Association for Competitive Technology Executive Director Morgan Reed made the following statement:

“For the past year, we have educated hundreds of app developers around the country on best practices for privacy and developed new transparency icons. The message from the FTC today is that they appreciate our work, but we still have a lot to do.”

“The rapid growth of the mobile app industry has been fueled by startups and first time developers, some of whom are still in high school. In fact 87% of apps aredeveloped by small or micro businesses that do not have legal departments or privacy experts on staff. This report reminds us how important it is for the industry to focus attention on educating developers on privacy best practices.”

“We partnered with the world’s largest group of educational app developers, Parents with Apps, to run educational seminars and even create a new set of privacy disclosure icons for kids apps. We are continuing this work in 2013 and expanding it to include to all app developers.”

“One area of progress that the FTC missed, however, is on unique device identifiers like Apple’s UDID. Apple and the other platforms are moving developers away from using device-specific identifiers that can be unified across apps and services, and are introducing alternatives to limit tracking that are app-specific for sharing with advertisers and other 3rd parties. This will make it very difficult to combine information based on these ID’s across multiple apps or the web. Additionally, the platforms have given parents very granular tools that allow them to prevent apps from accessing certain types of data (like geolocation) regardless of app settings.”

ACT Statement on FTC Google Penalty Impact on Small Business

Thursday, August 9th, 2012

Association for Competitive Technology President Jonathan Zuck issued the following statement in response to the news that Google will pay $22.5 million in a settlement with the FTC after violating user browser preferences to prevent internet tracking. In the settlement, Google is not required to admit guilt and will pay a sum that it will earn in less than five hours.

“It’s amazing that Google is clinging to this explanation that a help page unedited from years ago is the only concern here. Google wrote a program to disable the privacy protections people used to prevent being tracked. The company actively collected information from people who didn’t want them to. It’s incredible that Google would suggest that overriding do-not-track protections was unintentional and involved no wrongdoing. It is clear that the biggest fines aren’t a deterrent if it only takes a few hours to pay them off and the perpetrator never even has to admit guilt. Commissioner Rosch was right to highlight these shortcomings of the settlement.

“The public grows ever fearful with each privacy violation that hits the headlines. If they feel nothing is happening to stop this behavior they will call on Congress to respond legislatively. The last thing small business entrepreneurs need right now are new laws and regulations that will stunt innovation and job growth. We need strong enforcement of existing laws and settlement agreements. The FTC can serve the entire online community well by providing this enforcement deterrence. The technology industry, and the public at large, would be better for it.”

CTIA/ESRB Collaboration Creates New Tools for Developers, Parents

Tuesday, November 29th, 2011

Association for Competitive Technology Executive Director Morgan Reed issued the following statement at the introduction of the Cellular Telephone and Internet Association’s (CTIA) collaborative initiative with the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) addressing mobile apps.

Mobile app developers have always appreciated voluntary programs that help us provide a better experience for our users. CTIA has wisely partnered with ESRB to produce a new initiative that can be a valuable resource to app developers and parents. Having effectively served as a guide for parents to choose appropriate video games for their children, ESRB is well-positioned to provide advisements for similar applications on mobile devices. Games on mobile devices now account for fifteen percent of industry revenues and this figure is growing. The CTIA/ESRB offering is a welcome addition to the self-regulatory efforts underway to provide greater consumer choice and transparency in the nascent mobile apps marketplace.

ACT Applauds DOJ Google Settlement in Drug Counterfeiting Case

Wednesday, August 24th, 2011

ACT applauds the $500 million forfeiture levied by the Justice Department against Google for profiting from pirated pharmaceuticals.  ACT President Jonathan Zuck issued the following statement in support of DOJ’s action today.

ACT strongly supports actions taken by the Justice Department today to punish Google for consistently violating the Controlled Substances Act to profit from advertisements of counterfeit drug sales.  It says a lot about a company’s unwillingness to act in the public interest when it takes a half-billion-dollar fine to stop it from facilitating illicit drug sales to children and seniors.

Google found itself in the middle of a multimillion dollar financial fraud investigation when a captured fugitive assisted an undercover operation revealing the search giant’s role in the “unlawful sale of drugs through Google’s AdWords program.” The Justice Department found that Google was aware of the problem for years and its involvement was not merely that of an innocent bystander — its representatives consistently provided assistance to drug counterfeiters helping to improve their ad campaigns.

Google has long pretended to be unaware of the mass piracy it facilitates and profits from through its dominant position in the online search and search advertising business.  Its pattern of encouraging piracy and counterfeiting has resulted in sizable lost revenue in the entertainment industry and in online educational products like Rosetta Stone.  Small business entrepreneurs find it particularly difficult to protect their products and combat piracy when Google allows counterfeiters to advertise stolen versions.

It’s about time that Google was taken to task for facilitating this criminal behavior.  American businesses will fare much better if the Justice Department continues to crack down on widespread piracy as it did in today’s Google settlement.

ACT Applauds Apple Steps to Protect App Developers in Lodsys License Dispute

Monday, May 23rd, 2011

The Association for Competitive Technology applauded Apple’s step today to reassure app developers that in-app purchases are covered by the Cupertino company’s license of Lodsys technology.  Last week, Lodsys sent letters to individual app developers demanding they license the use of its technology.  ACT Executive Director Morgan Reed:

The developer community is pleased that Apple has taken steps to reassure app makers regarding Lodsys’s licensing demands.  Lodsys in-app purchasing technology is already licensed by Apple.  Developers share that company’s understanding that in-app purchasing applications written for its iOS platform are covered under this license.  Lodsys has created uncertainty in the apps marketplace and we hope that it will take the appropriate step to withdraw its unwarranted licensing demands.

ACT Applauds TiVo-Echostar Settlement as Victory for Small Business Intellectual Property Rights

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

The Association for Competitive Technology today applauded the settlement reached between TiVo and Echostar as a victory for intellectual property rights.  ACT submitted two amicus briefs in the case supporting TiVo in its case against Echostar.  ACT’s Morgan Reed issued the following statement in response to the settlement.

Today’s settlement marks a decisive moment for startups and small business innovators.  Despite the widespread adoption of its DVR, TiVo remains a small business.  Like other small companies, it can compete with massive companies like EchoStar by creating game-changing new technologies.  TiVo had a great new product that changed the way we watch TV, but had to fight more than a decade to keep Echostar from stealing it.

Last month’s court decision, and today’s resulting settlement, was a big victory for startups.  It  showed that courts will protect the intellectual property of a small business no matter how many resources a big company throws at them.  This is crucial for entrepreneurs because they will only take risks making new companies and technologies if they are certain their innovation will be protected from copycats and thieves.

ACT Responds to Apps Developers’ Concerns over CTIA Regulatory Proposal

Monday, May 2nd, 2011

The Association for Competitive Technology, a trade association representing thousands of mobile app and software developers, today responded to the Cellular Telephone and Internet Association’s proposal to rate smartphone apps, rejecting the suggestion that CTIA act as the apps regulator.  Software developers have expressed loud and clear that they do not want an association with competing interests to regulate the applications ecosystem.

“Recently, government officials and trade associations have been speaking about app developers, but no one has been speaking to app developers,” said ACT Executive Director Morgan Reed.  “Wireless carriers and their representatives have suggested that apps developers submit to a ‘self-regulatory’ process in which carriers and handset manufacturers would set and enforce standards. This is not the right direction.

“We have heard loud and clear from our members that any self-regulatory initiative for apps developers should be undertaken by apps developers.  They are wise enough to understand that self-regulation does not mean putting your company’s future in the hands of another industry.

“Phone manufacturers have helped to create an ecosystem that supports our applications, but their concerns are focused on maximizing the number of handsets sold, not on the needs of application developers.  An onerous rating system may have no direct impact on handset sales, but could devastate a small developer whose business relies on the ability of consumers to determine for themselves which feature sets they prefer.”

App sales are currently a $2 billion-a-year industry, expected to rise to $38 billion by 2015.  The rising demand for wireless broadband and mobile devices derives largely from the widespread availability of apps created by application developers to make these devices productive and enjoyable to use.

A copy of the ACT letter to CTIA may be found here, http://acton.li/mQFSUg

ACT Applauds Court Decision in Favor of TiVo

Wednesday, April 20th, 2011

The Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) applauded today’s Federal Circuit Court decision in Tivo v. Echostar.  ACT filed a brief in the case in support of TiVo against Echostar’s infringement of its intellectual property and its repeated contempt violations for refusing to disable infringing devices.

“Today’s decision by the Federal Circuit has finally brought an end to Echostar’s strategy of infringe first and ignore the courts later,” said ACT Executive Director Morgan Reed.  “After repeatedly being found in contempt for failing to halt its infringement of TiVo’s DVR technology, Echostar now faces substantial penalties and damages, and the enforcement of a permanent injunction requiring its infringing DVRs be disabled.

“This important decision vindicates the substance of Tivo’s claims that Echostar acted with contempt for both Tivo’s federal patent rights and the federal court proceedings Tivo was forced to file to enforce them. The Federal Circuit’s clarification of its own prior standard for assessing contempt in patent infringement cases will require some further proceedings on remand to the district court. Nevertheless, the seriousness of the rulings affirmed by the Federal Circuit should require swift and expedited action on remand to ensure that Echostar finally ceases to benefit from its long strategy of infringement, delay and contempt.

“TiVo’s victory in this case is important for startups and small and medium-sized businesses that take risks to create innovative new products and marketplaces.  The protection of intellectual property is essential for startups to invest in innovation and today’s decision reaffirms that.”