Archive for the ‘News Item’ Category

News.com – T3 Files Antitrust Complaint Against IBM in Europe

Tuesday, November 16th, 2010

According to News.com, T3 Technologies filed an antitrust complaint against IBM with the European Commission:

T3, a maker of IBM-compatible mainframes for small to midsize companies, is asking the European Commission to investigate IBM’s market pricing and alleged effort to eliminate competition by withholding its patent licenses for its mainframe operating system and certain intellectual property.

“Since November 2006, we have not been able to sell any of our hardware. No rational buyer would buy any hardware without software,” said Steven Friedman, T3′s president.

The article goes on to outline the actions the led to the antitrust complaint:

T3 began marketing its IBM-compatible tServer mainframe line in 2000, using software from Fundamental Software that was based on an IBM patent license.

But in 2005, T3 signed an agreement with Platform Solutions Inc. (PSI), which would enable the small mainframe maker to create a more robust mainframe system, Liberty, that would put it in further competition with IBM, Friedman said.

The following year, T3 was hit with a one-two punch, as it shipped Liberty. IBM said it would not license its operating system to PSI or to Fundamental Software any longer.

You can read the full article at CNET.

French Competition Authority Press Release on Google AdWords Rule Decision

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

The French Competition Authority Press Release stated:

Following the interim measures issued by the Autorité de la concurrence last June, Google commits to modify in a more transparent and predictable way for advertisers the rules governing its online advertising service, AdWords.

Following a complaint filed by Navx denouncing discriminatory practices, the French Autorité de la concurrence issued last June interim measures against Google.

Navx sells databases for GPS navigation devices indicating the localisation of fixed and mobile speed cameras exclusively via Internet. It uses Google’s online advertising service AdWords to appear in adjacent commercial links to web searches. In November 2009, Navx’ AdWords account was suspended by Google. The latter stated that its content policy for devices aimed at evading road traffic speed cameras in France had been modified in a more restrictive way. For its part, Navx complained of the sudden break off of its contract and of a discriminatory treatment from Google to its disadvantage.

The full press release is available here.

Wall Street Journal – French Competition Authority Rules Google Must Allow Navx Ads

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

THe Wall Street Journal reports that the French competition authority ruled “Google Inc. (GOOG) has to accept ads from the French company Navx after the search engine suspended the company’s AdWords account.”

The article said:

“The (competition authority) has said that software showing the location of speed cameras and radar detectors is legal in France, clarifying what was previously a gray area,” Google said in a separate statement, adding: “We have revised our ads policy for these products, which has helped resolve the NavX complaint.”

The company said the regulator “has recognized Google’s right to set clear content policies that guarantee ads are appropriate. In its decision to close this case, [the authority] made no finding of dominance or monopoly abuse.”

The full article is here.

OUT-LAW.COM – Google clarifies AdWords policy to satisfy French competition regulator

Monday, November 1st, 2010

According to Out-Law.com:

Google has agreed to clarify its rules on which devices or services are banned from being advertised in its search engine results after concerns were expressed by France’s competition authority. Google suspended the advertising account of Navx in November of last year. The company operates websites which provide information to drivers, including details of the locations of speed cameras.

Google’s advertising policy barred the advertising of speed camera location services, but the Autorité de la Concurrence, France’s competition watchdog, responded to a complaint by Navx by telling Google to lift the ban while it investigated.

The full article is available here.

FairSearch.org Press Release – Online Travel and Technology Companies Launch FairSearch.org Coalition, Urge Justice Department to Challenge Google-ITA Deal

Tuesday, October 26th, 2010

WASHINGTON, D.C. – October 26, 2010 – Leading online travel sites and travel technology companies have formed the FairSearch.org coalition to support competition, transparency and innovation in online search. The coalition is urging the Justice Department to challenge Google’s proposed $700 million acquisition of ITA Software, the flight search technology that powers many of the web’s most popular travel sites, including KAYAK and Hotwire. Acquiring ITA Software would give Google control over the software that powers most of its closest rivals in travel search and could enable Google to manipulate and dominate the online air travel marketplace. The end result could be higher travel prices, fewer travel choices for consumers and businesses, and less innovation in online travel search.

Read the full press release here.

Wall Street Journal – Travel Sites Ally to Block Google Deal

Monday, October 25th, 2010

According to the Wall Street Journal:

Several popular online travel companies are joining forces to oppose Google’s proposed $700 million purchase of ITA Software Inc., the leading provider of flight data, saying the deal would give it too much sway over the travel sector. Expedia Inc., Kayak.com, Sabre Holdings and Farelogix Inc.—which operate half-a-dozen leading online travel sites—are forming a coalition called FairSearch.org to persuade the Justice Department to block Google’s latest deal.

Coalition members are concerned that:

Google could limit access to ITA’s software, which is used by many of the flight-comparison sites operated by the members of the newly formed coalition. Expedia also runs Hotwire and TripAdvisor. Sabre runs Travelocity, while Kayak runs SideStep in addition to Kayak.com.

In addition, they believe that

Google’s power over an ever-expanding array of businesses as it reaches into sectors from broadband Internet to mobile telephony and now travel. They cite figures from Experian Hitwise showing that Google is the source of more than 30% of all search engine traffic to online travel sites—and could direct that traffic its own way.

“Google has tremendous power in the search market, and it gives Google the ability to steer users in directions that are best for Google,” Expedia’s counsel, Thomas Barnett, said in an interview. “All of that would ultimately end up harming consumers.”

The Full WSJ Article is available here.

Google, Everywhere, Or How Privacy Is The Net’s Biggest Quagmire

Friday, October 15th, 2010

NPR’s All Tech Considered covers the efforts of a San Francisco-based artist to highlight Google’s growing ubiquity and the amount of information it collects on users every moment of every day.  The article and video do not suggest any immediate antitrust concerns, but they are illustrative of a growing sense of concern in the media about Google’s size and business practices.

Here is a quick excerpt

Google is everywhere.

That’s something we take for granted: The behemoth controls our e-mail and our searches; their tracking codes cover a great portion of the usable web.

Jamie Wilkinson, a technologist and artist based in San Francisco, has been trying to bring this issue into public discussion for a while now. Today, he released a plugin for Firefox and Google’s own Chrome that sounds an alarm whenever it finds that your browser is sending any information to Google.

“In effect,” he said, “it’s an exploration of how ubiquitous Google has become.”

Google Alarm from Jamie Dubs on Vimeo.

Bloomberg – Software Developers Worried about Google’s ITA Acquisition

Thursday, September 16th, 2010

Bloomberg reported on a House Judiciary Committee hearing that discussed Google’s Acquisition of ITA. The article quoted ACT executive director Morgan Reed:

Independent software developers told U.S. lawmakers they may be unable to get fair access to flight-information provider ITA Software Inc.’s travel-search feature after Google Inc. buys the company.

“The concern is about access to the engine and who gets the best quality result,” said Morgan Reed, executive director for the Association for Competitive Technology, a Washington- based group for 3,000 developers whose sponsors include Microsoft Corp., eBay Inc. and Oracle Corp. Reed testified today at a House Judiciary Committee panel hearing.

The comment “set off alarm bells” for companies such as Kayak.com, which searches more than 400 travel sites to offer competitive deals, Reed said today. ITA “isn’t a stand-alone product, it’s a search engine.”

The full Bloomberg article is available here.

eWeek – Google ITA Bid Slowed by DOJ Scrutiny

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

eWeek reports that the Department of Justice has entered an extended review period for Google’s acquisition of ITA Software:

The Department of Justice is taking a harder look at Google’s $700 million bid to buy ITA Software, lodging a second request with the search engine for more information about the deal. Google last month agreed to buy the flight information software specialist to build new flight search tools that will make it easier for users to search for flights, compare flight options and prices, and shuttle users to a site to purchase tickets.

…Kayak expressed concern that Google could shut off its access to the ITA data, something the search engine pledged not to do.

The full eWeek article is available here.

FTC Press Release – FTC Settles Charges of Anticompetitive Conduct Against Intel

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

The FTC Press Release announcing the proposed settlement between Intel and FTC:

The Federal Trade Commission approved a settlement with Intel Corp. that resolves charges the company illegally stifled competition in the market for computer chips. Intel has agreed to provisions that will open the door to renewed competition and prevent Intel from suppressing competition in the future.

The settlement goes beyond the terms applied to Intel in previous actions against the company and will help restore competition that was lost as a result of Intel’s alleged past anticompetitive tactics. At the same time, the settlement will leave the company room to innovate and offer competitive pricing.

“This case demonstrates that the FTC is willing to challenge anticompetitive conduct by even the most powerful companies in the fastest-moving industries,” said Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “By accepting this settlement, we open the door to competition today and address Intel’s anticompetitive conduct in a way that may not have been available in a final judgment years from now. Everyone, including Intel, gets a greater degree of certainty about the rules of the road going forward, which allows all the companies in this dynamic industry to move ahead and build better, more innovative products.”

The press release explains that “A consent agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission of a law violation,” and announces the key components of the settlement:

Under the settlement, Intel will be prohibited from:

conditioning benefits to computer makers in exchange for their promise to buy chips from Intel exclusively or to refuse to buy chips from others; and
retaliating against computer makers if they do business with non-Intel suppliers by withholding benefits from them.
In addition, the FTC settlement order will require Intel to:

modify its intellectual property agreements with AMD, Nvidia, and Via so that those companies have more freedom to consider mergers or joint ventures with other companies, without the threat of being sued by Intel for patent infringement;
offer to extend Via’s x86 licensing agreement for five years beyond the current agreement, which expires in 2013;
maintain a key interface, known as the PCI Express Bus, for at least six years in a way that will not limit the performance of graphics processing chips. These assurances will provide incentives to manufacturers of complementary, and potentially competitive, products to Intel’s CPUs to continue to innovate; and
disclose to software developers that Intel computer compilers discriminate between Intel chips and non-Intel chips, and that they may not register all the features of non-Intel chips. Intel also will have to reimburse all software vendors who want to recompile their software using a non-Intel compiler.
The FTC vote approving the proposed settlement order was 4-0, with Commissioner William E. Kovacic recused. The order will be subject to public comment for 30 days, until September 7, 2010, after which the Commission will decide whether to make it final. Comments should be sent to: FTC, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580. To submit a comment electronically, please click on: https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/intel/.

The Full Press Release is Available on the FTC website